There's a lot of political maneuvering over real MPG's v. claimed, Nox emissions and so forth. Renault have so far escaped lightly but Fiat are currently taking a hammering.
Sandero DCi 66KW has been named among the worst 'polluters' in
this report, with 12.8 times the RDE (recommended daily emissions) tests, mostly due to cold-start emissions levels.
Because emissions are essentially waste fuel, Renault and others are working on new cold start maps and technologies to control these. As Roger says, granny-driving can approach the manufactures' figures, but on busy roads in cold climates, it's almost impossible.
On the upside I did get 70 mpg when the car was new and I was nursing it around by driving it to Belgium and back, but I'm pretty happy with 58 mpg average. If ever the fuel light comes on, I know I can nurse the car home at 65 mpg, slowly.
One final thought comes to mind, a lot of work has been done on turbo-engine efficiencies at 'out-of-boost' engine speeds, which is about 1200-1650 rpm on the DCi's. Because these cars are long geared for fuel efficiency, I have (un-substantiated! ) suspicions that some drivers might be using the old school techniques of engaging fifth as soon as possible, when the DCi engine is most efficient with the turbo spooling. (1800-3000 rpm.) The Logan DCi is geared for 2000 rpm at 70 mph, right in the boost zone.
Driving out-of-boost for long periods causes deposit build-up on the cylinder walls and piston/skirts/crowns, which leads to more friction, emissions and cylinder wear, but it's more noticeable on cold-running petrol engines.
I still don't know if buying a diesel was the 'Right Thing'. The extra torque is great, as is the fuel economy, but the current political/Twitter outcry along the lines of 'Ban Diesels from Major Cities' is worrying.
Lovely car though.
